In 1989, a painting believed to be by Bertholet Flémalle was auctioned in New York. Thanks to one virtually unmistakable detail, however, it is now possible to restore it to Frans de Jongh (fig. 4),[10] for in the middle of the group of three figures on the right is the very portrait that Taco Jelgersma copied (fig. 3), showing De Jongh in his bearskin hat. It must therefore be the piece referred to as De Jongh's painting of Claudius Civilis, with his "own portrait", which belonged to Frans Decker until 1752. Jelgersma, a bachelor, had lodgings in the home of Frans Decker, and the painting was presumably in his collection when Jelgersma copied the self-portrait from it in 1740.[11]

5. Antonio Tempesta after Otto van Veen, Claudius Civilis Conversing with the Commander of the Roman Army. Etching, 16.4 x 21 cm, 1612
That the painting indeed depicts Claudius Civilis Conversing with the Roman Commander is confirmed by one of 36 etchings by Antonio Tempesta after designs by Otto van Veen. These prints were published in 1612 as Batavorum cum Romanis bellum, and no. 15 (fig. 5) shows Claudius Civilis with the Roman general, who has ventured out of his beleaguered encampment to sue for peace.[12] Civilis, his finger raised to lend emphasis to his words, refuses, as the Romans had killed his brother, while he himself, despite years of loyalty, had been held captive. De Jongh clearly based his painting on Tempesta's print, although he reversed and modified the composition. The figure holding a horse by the reins on the left behind Civilis is a slightly altered version of a figure in another Tempesta etching, no. 11 of the latter's series Alexandri Magni praecipuae res gestae.[13] De Jongh portrayed himself as a Batavian standing between the Roman general and his lieutenant, whom he is eyeing vigilantly from under his bearskin hat. Both the Batavian with De Jongh's features, and the lieutenant were inspired by etchings from Salvator Rosa's famous Figurine series. The Batavian's headgear and the way he is holding his spear over his shoulder have a distinct affinity with the figure in Rosa's etching of a Warrior in a Lionskin Hat (fig. 6).[14] The lieutenant is borrowed from Rosa's etching Warrior with a Staff (fig. 7),[15] who is in a very similar pose, standing with his hand on his hip, the fingers pointing backwards, and is wearing the same costume, even down to details like the rolled-up trousers, the barely visible sword, and the metal breastplate held in place with straps. Rosa's prints, like Tempesta's etching of Civilis, are used in mirror-image. Given that De Jongh based his painting on four different prints, it is not unreasonable to assume that he drew on another one for the most elegant figure of all, the soldier viewed from the back on the far left.

6. Salvator Rosa, Warrior in a Lionskin Hat, 1656-1657. Etching, 14.2 x 9.2 cm

7. Salvator Rosa, Warrior with a Staff, 1656-1657. Etching, 14 x 9.1 cm
The two paintings in Copenhagen are known to have been among the works from the Arundel Collection that were auctioned in Amsterdam in 1684.[16] Jason and the Dragon (fig. 1) is a modified copy after a composition by Salvator Rosa, the best-known version of which is the painting at the Museum of Fine Art in Montreal.[17] Rosa's composition is believed to date from the late 1660s.[18] As the earliest provenance of the various versions - two of which are believed to be autograph - is unknown, it is impossible to say where De Jongh saw the model on which his work is based.[19] Cadmus and the Dragon, as has been noted beneath the photograph at the Netherlands Institute for Art History (RKD) in The Hague, was probably also based on a composition by Rosa, although I have failed to trace a Rosa painting that De Jongh might have used as his model.[20]
There are a number of similarities between the Copenhagen paintings and the picture of Civilis. The rendering of hands, feet, arms and legs, as well as the folds of the draperies and the details of the breastplates, leave us in no doubt that the three paintings are by the same hand. (The hero in Rosa's Jason and the Dragon in Montreal, however, is not wearing a close-fitting cuirass.)[21] Another feature that De Jongh's three paintings have in common is the strictly horizontal bands of light cutting across the sky, which are again missing in Rosa's composition in Montreal. The unusual metal band around Jason's upper arm and over the sleeve of his garment in the Rosa is also worn by Jason, Cadmus and Civilis in De Jongh's paintings.
History painting in Haarlem is generally thought to have undergone a gradual decline after about 1660, in terms of both quality and the number of works produced, and to have disappeared almost entirely in the final two decades of the century. Jan de Braij's overmantel depicting The Judgment of Zaleucus might be seen as one of the last highlights of the genre.[22 ] However, much has yet to be learnt about Haarlem history painting during this period. Very recently, for example, two history pieces were added to the small oeuvre of the Haarlem master Reijer Jacobsz. van Blommendael, who was active from around 1660 and who died in 1675.[23 ] His work is entirely in the Haarlem Classicist tradition. In view of their provenance, De Jongh's Copenhagen paintings must have been made before 1684, while his relatively youthful self-portrait in the painting of Civilis suggests a date before the end of the 1670s. Unlike Van Blommendael, De Jongh occupies an exceptional position among late Haarlem history painters, for as far as I can see nothing in his three paintings distinguishes them as work from Haarlem. In fact, they are more reminiscent of the refined, late Classicist works of Gerard de Lairesse, a contemporary of his in Amsterdam.
From: Hoogsteder-Naumann
Mercury 13/14
COPYRIGHT
1992 Hoogsteder & Hoogsteder, J. van Tatenhove All rights reserved.
No
portion of this article nor the accompanying illustrations can or may
be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright
holder.