The controversy over the Vinland map – genuine artefact or forgery – has caused the most heated arguments ever generated by a map. Colleague has been set against colleague, friend against friend, and still the dispute rumbles on. Whether the evidence to prove its authenticity or disprove it will ever emerge it is hard to say. In the meantime Helen Wallis, retired Map Librarian of the British Library, London, who first saw the map thirty years ago, tells the story as she sees it. The map was on display recently at the British Museum in the exhibition 'Fake? The Art of Deception'.

WHEN THE VINLAND MAP was revealed to the world on October 11, 1965, it hit the headlines. Through a coincidence of timing (October 12 is Columbus Day in the USA), it caused a riot among the Italians of New York. The map was the subject of numerous articles, reviews, and cartoons. Its promoters claimed that it had a unique place in the history of cartography. In the north-west Atlantic it displays coastlines which are identified as representations of the Norse discovery of Vinland, now generally accepted as part of north-eastern America. The map thus records in graphic form the pre-Columbian discovery of America.[1]


The Vinland map photographed recently for the exhibition at the British Museum 'Fake? The art of deception'. (By courtesy of the British Museum)


The Vinland map and the 'Tartar Relation' on display at an earlier exhibition in 1967 in the King's Library of the British Museum. (Also shown was the manuscript 'Speculum Historiale' of Vincent de Beauvais.) (By courtesy of Helen Wallis)